Are cinema lenses really worth the hype? Many filmmakers and cinematographers swear by the use of high-quality cinema lenses for their projects, claiming that they offer unparalleled image quality and depth of field. However, others argue that the difference in image quality between cinema lenses and high-end photography lenses is negligible, especially in the age of advanced digital cameras. In this blog post, we will be taking a closer look at the DZO Vespid Primes and whether they live up to the hype. We will be providing a detailed six-month review of these cinema lenses, discussing their performance, build quality, and overall value for filmmakers and cinematographers. Let’s delve into the world of cinema lenses and see if they are truly overrated or worth the investment.
Are Cinema Lenses Overrated? Worth all the Hype? – DZO Vespid Primes 6 Month Review
With all the amazing Autofocus lenses currently out there, one has to ask the question, are Cinema lenses overrated? I think it depends who you ask but the short and simple answer is Absolutely NOT. Maybe the bigger question here is, who is it for or even better, WHEN is it for? In this article, I’m going to share my thoughts on where I think cinema lenses fit in, and if they can add value to someone like me, a solo creator who either works alone or with smaller crews. I’ll be sharing my experience working with the DZO Vespid Primes which I’ve been using for the past 6 months in a variety of projects. Disclaimer, DZO did not pay me a cent to make this, I got the set on loan for review purposes and I have the option to return or purchase them, a question I’ll be answering at the end.
The Look and Image Quality
First we need to establish the WHY behind these lenses. As someone who’s pretty skilled in using Autofocus one would ask WHY? Why would I go full manual if stills lenses perform so incredibly well. Is it possible that stills lenses perform too well? That they look too sharp and too Perfect? Again not an easy answer because in some projects, this is what I want, it’s what I need! The first and main reason why so many TVC’s and Feature Films are shot on cinema lenses is because of the look. Each brand produces unique looking Images with their own characteristics. From Bokeh, to chromatic aberration to flares, directors & DP’s usually choose them because they’re going after a certain look, a look that cannot be recreated by modern stills lenses. This is also why mist filters have become so popular because they help to take that digital edge off from modern sensors and super sharp stills lenses. Cinema lenses in general are not perfect and that’s the point. To me, DZO falls right in the middle, not overly sharp or soft but a perfect Blend of quality and character that produces an organic looking image. If you come from stills lenses, you’ll notice it the moment you start shooting. There’s just something flattering about the image, something I’m unable to re-produce in post. The colour reproduction is beautiful with creamy bokeh & natural contrast. Stills lenses tend to produce More contrasty images, something a mist filter reduces but with the DZO lenses I hardly use mist filters unless I really want the highlights to bloom for creative effect. If you’re looking for a very clean and perfectly sharp image with zero distortion, you’re not gonna Get it here because these lenses do exhibit some chromatic aberration & barrel distortion, an attribute that is quite common in cinema and vintage lenses forming part of its character. Chromatic abberation is a slight split between red green and blue and is something I personally find quite flattering. If you pixel peep at a chart it might look like a serious flaw but when viewing the overall image at 100% it only ads character. The lenses flare really nice and overall I’m happy with how the they react to various light Sources. I’ve fallen in love with the look but now the big challenge arises.
For someone who’s relied on autofocus for such a long time, trying to focus pull yourself the entire time might just be a stretch too far. You’ve got 4 options here: Option 1, start making use of a 1st AC to pull focus for you. Option 2: Try out the Autofocus setup using LiDar & A focus motor. Option 3, Pull focus yourself, either with your hand physically on the lens or using a follow focus. Option 4, Just use a stills lens with amazing Autofocus. Any of these 4 options will come down to the project so lets figure that out. For films that are scripted shot for shot where you have some control over whats happening in the scene, I’m thinking music videos, commercials, corporate promos and any story driven content, If you want to make use of Cinema lenses, you will need a dedicated focus puller. Although a 1st AC takes up some of the project budget, to me the benefits outweigh the cost. Benefits include someone exclusively managing your rig to have you shoot ready at all times. Someone to hand The camera to you and take it off your hands when you’re not filming but most important, someone to take the entire burden of focus from your shoulders. Concentrating on focus can take up a lot of mind space because you’re not fully focused On whats happening inside the frame. Even with Autofocus in some scenarios it can be such a distraction trying to get the settings right or trying to confirm if the shot is in focus or not. With a focus puller you can just be creative and focus on the Framing and the movement of the camera. Manual focus enables you to rack focus between subjects at the right time without the possibility of the image hunting in any way.
Option 2 is to use LiDaR with a focus motor set to Autofocus. This is only something I recommend when you shoot single objects that move around like fashion with a model, a helicopter or any object that’s easy to track. As the technology improves one might be able to get more performance out of it but for now it’s limited and the AutoFocus I get on my Sony lenses are still superior.
Option 3, pulling yourself is more viable when the camera itself doesn’t have to move too much and the subject movement is a bit easier to manage, like what I did in this turtle documentary as I switch from the screen to the talent at the Right time. You can take it a step further using a follow focus on your rig that’s situated in a better position instead of having your hand on the lens. Same setup on a Gimbal, if the movements aren’t crazy you can easily correct the focus with the flick of a finger. This could work on some projects but I won’t recommend it for anything where you have to direct and shoot because when concentrating so much on focus you wont be able to judge the performance.
Option 4 using autofocus on a stills lens is something I still recommend for solo operators Shooting mostly run & gun, documentary and event style shoots. Shoots where subject movement is totally unpredictable or where time simply doesn’t allow for the luxury of setting up at each scene. I still use AutoFocus a lot on some of the day to day projects especially on the Gimbal because I can shoot wide open and do big movements without even thinking about focus. The real push from AF to Manual comes in when AF is not able to distinguish when and where to focus. This might only be for 5 or 10% of the shots in your film but when you Really need to control the focus, having a good focus ring is everything. Cinema lenses have a longer focus throw, which is great because it gives you much finer control over your focus. Both the focus and aperture rings on the DZO Vespids rotate smooth as butter making accurate pulls Easier. The focus is 100% mechanical, so nothing to do with how fast you turn it but only how far. The DZO Vespids are very well built and feels super solid in your hands. All the gears are in the same position across the entire set of lenses, simplifying the swapping out of lenses Keeping the follow focus in the same place. Something I also love about these lenses is that there is very little focus breathing. Focus breathing is when the movement in the frame changes as you pull focus from one extreme to the other. Now some of the new Sony Cameras Have breathing compensation but compared to vintage lenses and other budget cinema lenses, the Vespids have the…
Are CINEMA LENSES Overrated? Worth all the Hype?
- What are cinema lenses? Cinema lenses are specifically designed for use in filmmaking and offer superior image quality, resolution, and control over characteristics such as focus and aperture.
- Are cinema lenses overrated? It depends on the specific needs and preferences of the filmmaker. Cinema lenses are designed to provide high-quality images and precise control, which can be essential for professional film production.
- Are DZO Vespid Primes worth the hype? Many filmmakers have praised the DZO Vespid Primes for their excellent image quality, build, and affordability. They offer a versatile and high-performance option for filmmakers looking for cinema lenses.
- 6 Month Review of DZO Vespid Primes After using the DZO Vespid Primes for 6 months, many filmmakers have reported positive experiences with the lenses, citing their sharpness, smooth focus, and overall value for the price.
I hope you find useful my article Are CINEMA LENSES Overrated? Worth all the Hype? – DZO Vespid Primes 6 Month Review, I also recommend you to read my other posts in my blog at this link.
If you need help with anything join the community or do not hesitate to contact me.
Best of luck! and follow your passion.
Please consider joining my newsletter or following me on social media if you like my content.